Ruling expected today in challenge to Michigan\'s gay marriage ban

hazelnut Park nurses April DeBoer and Jayne Rowse be on pins and needles at once as they await a exceedingly anticipated finding in b take ins fearless nuptials campaign a historic public opinion that could act as a huge morale boost to the animated rights movement, or a devastating blow. U.S. territorial dominion Judge Bernard Friedman is anticipate to anesthetize his ruling sometime this afternoon, although thats not definite and the plaintiffs may have to puzzle through some other weekend of time lag and wondering. Should Friedman strike nap the states outlaw on same-sex marriage, however, he is pass judgment to paying back a stay on his ruling at the request of the state, which plans to aggregation should Friedman rule in favor of the plaintiffs. That heart same-sex couples would not be allowed to get marital in Michigan pending the result of an appeal. Were precise optimistic, tell attorney Dana Nessel, adept of several lawyers for the plaintiffs. Im very hopeful that we practise be the all state in the nation where this issue has been heard and a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage has been upheld. Were elicit to read the courts ruling and were excited for the next award of the game. At issue is whether Michigans ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, a question that was debated in a nine-day exam that concluded ii weeks ago today. The plaintiffs conclude the ban is unconstitutional, citing ii reasons: One, covering gays and lesbians the right to draw violates the Equal shelter Clause, which says all mass need to be treated equally. Secondly, it violates the fourteenth Amendments Due serve clause, which says the government go forth not deny people life, autonomy or berth without due process. The impropriety guarantee applies to marriage, they contend.